SBM of FTX has got things to say too...
On NOVEMBER 30th, Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, who seems to have stolen and otherwise misdirected billions from his own crypto scam, was invited to speak at a New York Times event called DealBook, writes Jeffrey Tucker for Addison Wiggin's Daily Reckoning.
A seat in the audience cost $2,499. He had been booked for the gig long before because he was a darling of the left, having thrown around many millions to back Democrats in the midterms.
He was also loved for running the second-largest crypto exchange in the world while babbling left-wing prattle about effective altruism and pandemic planning. He advertised himself as the world's most generous billionaire at a mere 30 years old! With his disheveled look and halting speech patterns, he struck many as a genius. One would have to let go of all normal intuition to believe that, but here is where we are today.
The interview pitched a series of softball questions with the mask of a tough interrogation. Bankman-Fried replied with a bunch of financial-sounding mumbo jumbo that the interviewer could not really follow, so of course he gave him a pass. In the end, the interviewer and the audience gave him a round of applause for his frank answers and accessibility.
Sam claimed that his lawyers advised against this particular appearance. I don't believe it. I suspect that his lawyers understand something very dark about our times. If you can bamboozle an audience at The New York Times, you stand a better chance of favorable treatment in a court of law.
That's why he was continuing his media rounds (at least before his arrest last Monday). Hey, why not a speaking tour to boot?
How did Bankman-Fried justify himself? Essentially he said that he had downplayed the downside risks in a possible bear market in which his tokens suddenly lost 90% of their value. He had not anticipated this. And, he seemed to imply, had the markets not changed directions, his company would be solvent. Hence, none of this is really his.
By comparison, Bernie Madoff's scam was rather simple. He used the money of new investors to pay a return to old investors. He gradually came to realize that he had better success in business by doing this than relying on market forces themselves. By offering a predictable 9% return, he could always attract new money in up markets or down markets.
In a sense he was right: His Ponzi scheme lasted 20 years!
When the housing market crashed and the money dried up, and Madoff could no longer find new chumps to pay the old chumps, he admitted it. He said he lied and that he was running a scam. He pled guilty, went to jail and died. One son killed himself and the other died. His widow today lives a modest life, still reeling from the horribleness of it all.
Sam's scheme was apparently far more complicated. It appears to have involved mixing funds over a huge range of companies that he owned, so his own exchange had an open spigot of customer funds going to his own Alameda Research, which would use those funds to buy the token FTT in which customer funds were held.
If so, it was the same scam as Madoff's but tokenized in a world that has stupidly come to believe that anyone can create a thing of value with a few mouse clicks and some incantations of the world blockchain.
Crucially, Bankman-Fried paid off all the right people along the way. He paid nonprofits, media companies and politicians and made all the right noises about the need to regulate the industry more than is currently the case.
As a result, his media darling status persists even now, as The New York Times and MSNBC worked hard daily to rehabilitate him, despite his not being able to account for some $20 billion in missing funds.
In the dystopian film and novel The Hunger Games, the elites have divided society into many districts depending on their function and economic status. Only District 1 truly lives well, and here you find the greatest champions of the system, which is kept alive through top-down tyranny.
The games themselves are designed to shore up regime stability by necessitating random sacrifices of the lives of kids forced into a zero-sum game of murder.
The whole thing looks implausible on first viewing. How could the richest of the rich sit by and watch cheering on this bloodthirsty tragedy? On second thought, the whole thing is wholly believable.
Elites socialize themselves to believe whatever it is that protects their wealth and status. That's exactly why such a large crowd of people gathered at The New York Times to watch the validation and vindication of Sam, and they happily cheered his fake honesty and transparency at the end.
The display was disgusting but entirely predictable if you understand something about how our own hunger games are played. In this decade and a half of easy money, a whole class of people has risen to the top of the cultural echelon not by productive labor but by educational credentials and being part of the corporate float. They have come to believe that the system makes sense simply because it has benefited them.
This is why they so gladly took to pandemic controls when they were at their height. They would "stay home and stay safe" while the proletariat slogged through the streets carrying dinners in bags to drop off at doorsteps. In some extremely strange way, this felt like a utopia for the upper classes.
This is always why the lockdowns lasted so long. We are nowhere close to getting to the bottom of the whole scam. SBF gave millions away to all sorts of institutions while marketing his grift as altruism.
He later admitted that his fake-woke philosophizing was nothing but a cover, as it is for all these people, which is why his admission didn't really disqualify him from continued membership in the class of media and business elites.
Nothing exposes the economic and financial hypocrisies of our time as much as this FTX caper. We can report some good news, however: It is not long for the world. Elon Musk is demonstrating how a competent leader can take over a single company, fire 75% of employees, make the platform work better than ever and still make a profit.
For the sake of civilization, let us hope that the Musk model will inspire many coming corporate upheavals.
District 1 needs to be thoroughly cleansed and the sooner the better. The cleansing fire in our times takes the most implausible form one can imagine: positive real interest rates. If the Fed sticks to its agenda – and it likely will – we will see every manner of upheaval coming in the next six months.
In the meantime, have fun in jail, SBF!