Gold News

Why De-Globalization is Bullish for Gold

Three signs of deglobalization, plus its bullish impact on Gold Prices...

YOU CAN SEE signs of de-globalization everywhere, writes Martin Hutchinson, contributing editor to Money Morning.

Just look at the intense shareholder opposition to Prudential Plc's proposed takeover of the Asian operations of American International Group Inc. The market scare on news that North Korea had, indeed, sunk a South Korean Naval vessel was another sign. The "flight to safety" in US Treasuries – sparked by the increasing concern about the future of the Euro and the viability of Greek government finances – is a third.

All over the world, little by little, the apparently inexorable tide of "globalization" – making the world "flat" in the words of Thomas L. Friedman's best-selling book – is retreating. If a full-scale financial crisis breaks out in the next few months, that retreat will become a rout. And the world will become de-globalized.

De-globalization has happened before. In the 50 years before 1914, the world had become increasingly globalized. That trend included some developments that are hard to imagine today...

  • Passports had become unnecessary for most travel;
  • Tariffs in some countries – most notably the United States and Kaiser Wilhelm II's Germany – remained punishingly high. But there was a system of global finance very much like the one we have today;
  • That system provided ready capital to the "emerging markets" of that era. And that, for example, transformed Argentina into one of the world's 10 richest countries.

New barriers against trade and finance were followed by a world war and protectionist policies. Then came the Great Depression. Before any real recovery had occurred, that global downturn caused most countries to raise barriers to imports. The international capital markets disappeared. And the volume of international trade declined by two thirds.

During the quarter century from 1950 to 1975, the world remained largely atomized. One-third of the world's population lived under political systems that did not allow markets to operate. Even outside the Russia/China bloc, international capital markets were very limited even for debt. And exchange controls in most countries outside the United States prevented all but a sliver of international equity investment.

The forces that would finally cause world-capital and world-trade markets to open got their start in 1979 with the emergence of British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher (who that year removed British price controls). The election of Ronald W. Reagan as US president shortly thereafter also was key, as was the fall of Communism a decade later.

In the 1990s, most countries were open to world trade, with free-price mechanisms and relatively low tariffs. Public and private equity investments in the "emerging markets" soared in popularity, in spite of the "Asian contagion" and Russian financial crises of 1997-98.

These developments were justified by the formerly socialist intellectuals as a new, moderate "Washington consensus," under which governments retained a role in moderating the forces of the market. The Washington consensus tended to fall apart under stress, as it did in Argentina, because of the excessive government spending to which it led. But it didn't hinder globalization in the form of free trade and free movement of capital.

With the 2008 financial-system crash, the "Washington consensus" fell apart. The intellectuals had been getting very bored with free markets and had moved on to "global warming" environmentalism. They seized the opportunity to blame free markets for the crash. That change in philosophy allowed protectionist forces in most countries to raise barriers in the form of subsidies and "anti-dumping" actions.

It also gave rise to the "stimulus" – thumping big increases in public spending and budget deficits, all of which were pushed through panicky legislatures. Banking systems were bailed out in a big way. But little was done to address the excessive leverage and ultra-low interest rates that had caused the problem.

We are now seeing the results. Trade barriers, in the form of anti-dumping actions and ecological subsidies, are far higher than they were a few years ago. Government finances are a mess. And investors are becoming more and more nervous about taking on foreign risk. Banks and hedge funds used cheap money to invest aggressively once the initial crisis was past. Now they're scared again.

There is right now a strong flow of funds into US Treasury bonds. But investors will soon discover that "safe haven" is one of the world's more dangerous investments.

If the panic over government debt leads to another financial crisis like that of 2008, further bailouts of the financial system are inevitable. And if that happens, be assured that we will move even closer to de-globalization.

Further trade barriers will appear, reducing the interchange between economies that is a major engine of world efficiency. But that's only part of the damage. Even worse will be the huge decline in international investing activity. Governments will either limit such investor activity, or investors will be unwilling to do so due to the perceived risk.

Investment will be largely domestic, but the United States will have lost much of its cheap capital advantage over other countries because of its persistent balance-of-payments shortfalls and budget deficits.

In that case, many of the economic advances that globalization has brought to the United States – and the world as a whole – will be reversed. The world economy will have to adapt to a much lower level of efficiency, with higher manufacturing costs and less outsourcing. Both inflation and unemployment will be high. The result: We'll be looking at a decade of inflationary recession, with declining living standards.

We have already traveled a considerable distance toward de-globalization and should work towards reversing this trend. We should keep trade barriers down and international capital markets open. As protection against the possibility that governments and markets will fail in this attempt, investors should look in one direction – at Gold.

In a world of inflationary recession, in which international investment opportunities are blocked and government bonds are dangerous, gold remains the most reliable store of value. Others will realize this. So people with investment gold in their portfolios will at least have the satisfaction of increasing their capital, while others are losing theirs.

Looking to make a Gold Investment today...

Now a contributing editor to both the Money Map Report and Money Morning, the much-respected free daily advisory service, Martin Hutchinson is an investment banker with more than 25 years’ experience. A graduate of Cambridge and Harvard universities, he moved from working on Wall Street and in the City, as well as in Spain and South Korea, to helping the governments of Bulgaria, Croatia and Macedonia establish their Treasury bond markets in the late '90s. Business and Economics Editor at United Press International from 2000-4, and a BreakingViews editor since 2006, Hutchinson is also author of the closely-followed Bear's Lair column at the Prudent Bear website.

See full archive of Martin Hutchinson.

Please Note: All articles published here are to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it. Please review our Terms & Conditions for accessing Gold News.

Follow Us

Facebook Youtube Twitter LinkedIn



Market Fundamentals